39 results found
Depending on how long you've been a customer you might have noticed we've been rolling out changes to all of our marketing and documentation pages (revamping the style and making them mobile friendly). We're currently in the middle of a revamp of the LimeLM interface itself.
So the variable would need to be defined earlier in the code-block (thus making things less copy-and-paste friendly) So it makes things at once clearer and more confusing.
Since I can't find a forms-friendly control that does that (ie, not a toolstrip bound control), I use your split button, even though I don't need the split itself.
Post by Wyatt O'Day on Oct 18, 2007Since I can't find a forms-friendly control that does that (ie, not a toolstrip bound control), I use your split button, even though I don't need the split itself.
hmm well i have spent more of my budget on specialized software to do this project.. it seams like im buying more software then im actually creating at this rate!!
Post by Wyatt O'Day on May 18, 2010hmm well i have spent more of my budget on specialized software to do this project.. it seams like im buying more software then im actually creating at this rate!!
The point is that this isn't really user friendly. We use the XML file to add new versions to a wyp file and an attribute for a file to specify conflict handling (i.e. use "full update", use "full file", "ignore", "fail", "merge") would be nice.
A more user friendly reply would be "You have no more rights to down load updates from ..., Please contact ... for more information".
However, right now i am on solo plan - we are still a 1 month old startup so we are really getting customers one by one - so going on the Plus plan is out of our budget to maybe get 1 or 2 customers in the next year.
I am waiting for incremental patches and the ability to create the .wyp file from scratch (hopefully as plain text/xml so that its more source control friendly) so that integration of the update process is cleaner in the build script.
Hi, I'm trying to figure out if I have a bug in my 'friendly reminder' code. Is the timed trial period based on 24 hour intervals or on calendar days?
If I request Lease in the GUI while starting app, it is stucked for that time, and then just show error message - it is not very user friendly. In version 4.0 there will be a 60 second timeout.
But setting up a tunnel for the program is not really user friendly.
Use the client-side blocking to present a friendly message to purchase more time on their update contract (or however you sell your product), and use the server-side blocking to actually prevent malicious users from using workarounds to try to get the update.
It's a farce: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_censorship_in_Australiahttp://www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/how-asics-attempt-to-block-one-website-took-down-250000-20130605-2np6v.htmlWe have grand plans for a National Broadband Network but that has descended into a farce of budget overruns and technology compromise: https://delimiter.com.au/2016/06/21/fact-check-turnbull-misleads-qa-audience-nbn/ - it is rife with politicking, rorting and incompetence.
You point something interesting on OSX : I call UseTrial() as a TA_USER, because it's more user-friendly not to ask for admin password (especially in university, where students cannot be admin).However, there is a flaw : they can create another session, and use the trial version again ...
- Larger companies do share more and more using terminal services-like or sessions-based infrastructure- Larger companie software budget is not necessarily growing, but still need to get the software to all users.
It's a great piece of software, love how user-friendly it is. I really hope this to become my commercial solution.
My search results, are copy friendly allowing me to easily grab the license key or any of the custom fields associated with the license.